<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A very quick defense of TV3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcguirk.eu/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350</link>
	<description>Conservative. Nationalist. Likes Cake.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350&#038;cpage=1#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350#comment-296</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about why TV3 should have broken the story. Unfortunately, the questions you raise about why the story should have been broken are precisely the questions TV3 didn&#039;t ask.

Frankly, the most offensive thing about the report is how amateurish it was. They had 48  hours, and still managed to look rushed and unprepared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about why TV3 should have broken the story. Unfortunately, the questions you raise about why the story should have been broken are precisely the questions TV3 didn&#8217;t ask.</p>
<p>Frankly, the most offensive thing about the report is how amateurish it was. They had 48  hours, and still managed to look rushed and unprepared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 200 Words &#187; Archives &#187; TV3 Right and Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350&#038;cpage=1#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>200 Words &#187; Archives &#187; TV3 Right and Wrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350#comment-295</guid>
		<description>[...] John McGuirk got it right when he argued that the news should be reported, given Lenihan&#8217;s position. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John McGuirk got it right when he argued that the news should be reported, given Lenihan&#8217;s position. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meckel</title>
		<link>http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350&#038;cpage=1#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Meckel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I would agree with you John but for one point; Brian Lenihan appears to have just been diagnosed and we&#039;re not even sure whether he has been fully diagnosed with histological confirmation and complete staging of his malignancy. Such a diagnosis is a massive blow to any man and to his family and I do think anyone, even the Taoiseach has a right to privacy whilst they grapple with such a diagnosis and decided on the appropriate treatment. To face such diagnosis and dilemmas over the Christmas period with a young family to consider is especially cruel and I think in the weeks following a diagnosis such as this the personal right to privacy and confidentiality outweighs the public&#039;s right to knowledge about their leaders&#039; health.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with you John but for one point; Brian Lenihan appears to have just been diagnosed and we&#8217;re not even sure whether he has been fully diagnosed with histological confirmation and complete staging of his malignancy. Such a diagnosis is a massive blow to any man and to his family and I do think anyone, even the Taoiseach has a right to privacy whilst they grapple with such a diagnosis and decided on the appropriate treatment. To face such diagnosis and dilemmas over the Christmas period with a young family to consider is especially cruel and I think in the weeks following a diagnosis such as this the personal right to privacy and confidentiality outweighs the public&#8217;s right to knowledge about their leaders&#8217; health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Derbinshire</title>
		<link>http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350&#038;cpage=1#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey Derbinshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcguirk.eu/?p=350#comment-284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading along for a while now.  I just wanted to drop you a comment to say keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading along for a while now.  I just wanted to drop you a comment to say keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
